United States v. Elder Tzacir-Garcia
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States v. Alfonso Lopez-Rodriguez (5th Cir. 2020)
- United States v. Ixcopal-Hernandez (5th Cir. 2023)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
In 2014, Elder Rocael Tzacir-Garcia pled guilty to one count of illegal reentry in violation of
The Supreme Court vacated our decision and remanded for us to reconsider in the light of
Sessions v. Dimaya
, --- U.S. ----,
Upon remand, we directed the parties to file supplemental briefing. Tzacir-Garcia asked that we remand this case for the district court to amend the judgment to reflect conviction and sentencing under § 1326(b)(1),
2
not § 1326(b)(2).
3
The United States agreed that we should reform the judgment.
See
United States v. Godoy
,
Since that supplemental briefing was filed, however, the opinion in
Burris
was withdrawn, and the panel, in the light of
Stokeling v. United States
, --- U.S. ----,
AFFIRMED.
Section 1326(b)(2) provides that any alien "whose removal was subsequent to a conviction for commission of an aggravated felony ... shall be fined under such title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both."
Section 1326(b)(1) provides that any alien "whose removal was subsequent to a conviction for commission of three or more misdemeanors involving drugs, crimes against the person, or both, or a felony (other than an aggravated felony) ... shall be fined under Title 18, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both."
While Tzacir-Garcia has completed his sentence, this issue is not moot because a conviction under § 1326(b)(2) has the collateral consequence of rendering an alien permanently inadmissible to the United States.
See
United States v. Ovalle-Garcia
,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.