U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2019

United States v. Erasmo Gayton

United States v. Erasmo Gayton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 3, 2019

United States v. Erasmo Gayton

Opinion

Case: 18-11113 Document: 00515021204 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/03/2019

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 3, 2019 No. 18-11113 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ERASMO RUIZ GAYTON, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16-CR-130-3

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Erasmo Ruiz Gayton has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Ruiz Gayton has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Ruiz Gayton’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 18-11113 Document: 00515021204 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/03/2019

No. 18-11113 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.