United States v. Miguel Jimenez, Jr.
United States v. Miguel Jimenez, Jr.
Opinion
Case: 18-40163 Document: 00515030904 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/11/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-40163 FILED Conference Calendar July 11, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MIGUEL JIMENEZ, JR., Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16-CR-5-1
Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Miguel Jimenez, Jr. has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Jimenez has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Jimenez’s claims of ineffective assistance of
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 18-40163 Document: 00515030904 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/11/2019
No. 18-40163 counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Jimenez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.