Case: 18-10661 Document: 00515060720 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/02/2019

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-10661 August 2, 2019 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RODERICK GUIDRY, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17-CR-257-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Roderick Guidry has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Guidry has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Guidry’s claims of ineffective assistance of

* Pursuant to Fifth Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Fifth Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

Case: 18-10661 Document: 00515060720 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/02/2019

No. 18-10661 counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Guidry’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See Fifth Circuit Rule 42.2.