U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2019

United States v. Jamaal Dunson

United States v. Jamaal Dunson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 26, 2019

United States v. Jamaal Dunson

Opinion

Case: 18-11036 Document: 00515090733 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/26/2019

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-11036 FILED Conference Calendar August 26, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JAMAAL ROZELL DUNSON, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:17-CR-61-1

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jamaal Rozell Dunson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Dunson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 18-11036 Document: 00515090733 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/26/2019

No. 18-11036 appellate review. See United States v. Pesina-Rodriguez, 825 F.3d 787, 788 (5th Cir. 2016). Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.