Case: 18-51076 Document: 00515156928 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/14/2019

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 18-51076 FILED October 14, 2019 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff–Appellee, v.

MAURO GONZALES, also known as Mauro Gonzalez, Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:18-CR-82-9

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Mauro Gonzales has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Gonzales has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Gonzales’s claims of ineffective assistance of

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 18-51076 Document: 00515156928 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/14/2019

No. 18-51076 counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Gonzales’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.