U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2019

Latiolais v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided May 8, 2019

923 F.3d 427 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Jody Edward Anderman, Cameron Ray Waddell, Litigation Counsel, Waddell Anderman, L.L.C., Baton Rouge, LA, Sean Patrick Brady, Esq., Thomas More Flanagan, Anders F. Holmgren, Flanagan Partners, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Gregory George Garre, Charles S. Dameron, Benjamin W. Snyder, Latham & Watkins, L.L.P., Washington, DC, David Michael Melancon, Esq., David Wayne O'Quinn, Esq., Irwin Fritchie Urquhart & Moore, L.L.C., New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Schexnayder v. McCarty Corporation (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 2020)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.