U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2020

United States v. Pablo Garcia-Silva

United States v. Pablo Garcia-Silva
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided January 7, 2020

United States v. Pablo Garcia-Silva

Opinion

Case: 19-40379 Document: 00515261563 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/07/2020

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 19-40379 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar January 7, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee v. PABLO ROLANDO GARCIA-SILVA, also known as Gaspar, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16-CR-876-4

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Pablo Rolando Garcia-Silva appeals the within-guidelines, 96-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846. His sole argument on appeal is that the district court erred by denying his request for a minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 19-40379 Document: 00515261563 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/07/2020

No. 19-40379 Whether a defendant is a minor participant under § 3B1.2 is a factual question reviewed for clear error. United States v. Gomez-Valle, 828 F.3d 324, 327 (5th Cir. 2016). “A factual finding is not clearly erroneous if it is plausible in light of the record read as a whole.” Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

The district court found that Garcia-Silva was at least an average participant and that finding is plausible in light of the record as a whole. See id. Thus, the district court did not clearly err in finding that Garcia-Silva was not a minor participant and denying his request for a mitigating role adjustment. See id.; United States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193, 204 (5th Cir. 2005).

The district court’s judgment is therefore AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.