U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2020

United States v. Rajubhai Patel

United States v. Rajubhai Patel
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided January 27, 2020

United States v. Rajubhai Patel

Opinion

Case: 18-20629 Document: 00515287110 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/27/2020

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-20629 January 27, 2020 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAJUBHAI BHOLABHAI PATEL, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16-CR-385-23

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Rajubhai Bholabhai Patel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Patel has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Patel’s response.

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 18-20629 Document: 00515287110 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/27/2020

No. 18-20629 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.