Case: 19-10648 Document: 00515431596 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/28/2020

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 19-10648 Fifth Circuit FILED Conference Calendar May 28, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff–Appellee, v. JOSE VEGA, also known as Mecanico, also known as Jose Martinez, also known as Jose Vega-Martinez, also known as Jose Martinez-Vega, Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17-CR-341-4

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Vega has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vega has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Vega’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 19-10648 Document: 00515431596 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/28/2020

No. 19-10648 therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review.

See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Vega’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.