Case: 19-11340 Document: 00515431653 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/28/2020

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 28, 2020 No. 19-11340 Lyle W. Cayce Conference Calendar Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. FRANCIS LEO STADLER, JR., Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:19-CR-70-1

Before ELROD, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Francis Leo Stadler, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Stadler has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Stadler’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 19-11340 Document: 00515431653 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/28/2020

No. 19-11340 prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Stadler’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.