U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2020

United States v. Adrian Jimenez-Reynoso

United States v. Adrian Jimenez-Reynoso
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided May 29, 2020

United States v. Adrian Jimenez-Reynoso

Opinion

Case: 19-10912 Document: 00515434054 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/29/2020

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 29, 2020 No. 19-10912 Lyle W. Cayce Conference Calendar Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ADRIAN JIMENEZ-REYNOSO, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:18-CR-323-9

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Adrian Jimenez-Reynoso has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jimenez-Reynoso has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Jimenez-Reynoso’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 19-10912 Document: 00515434054 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/29/2020

No. 19-10912 appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.