U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2020

United States v. Miguel Rangel-Bazan

United States v. Miguel Rangel-Bazan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 5, 2020

United States v. Miguel Rangel-Bazan

Opinion

Case: 19-40850 Document: 00515442877 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/05/2020

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 19-40850 Fifth Circuit FILED Conference Calendar June 5, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee v. MIGUEL RANGEL-BAZAN, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:19-CR-908-1

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Rangel-Bazan has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rangel-Bazan has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Rangel-Bazan’s response. We concur with counsel’s

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 19-40850 Document: 00515442877 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/05/2020

No. 19-40850 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.