United States v. Arturo Rico-Espinoza
United States v. Arturo Rico-Espinoza
Opinion
Case: 19-40679 Document: 00515445694 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/09/2020
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-40679 June 9, 2020 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ARTURO RICO-ESPINOZA, also known as Jose Arturo Rico-Espinoza, also known as Rico J. Arturo, also known as Arturo E. Rico, also known as Abel Espinoza Rico, also known as Arturo Espinoza Rico, also known as Rico Jose Arturo, also known as Jose Arturo Rico, also known as Constancio Sorcio Romero, also known as Constancio Sorsia Aromero, also known as Arturo Rico Espinoza, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:19-CR-221-1
Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arturo Rico- Espinoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 19-40679 Document: 00515445694 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/09/2020
No. 19-40679 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rico-Espinoza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.