United States v. Miriam Herrera
United States v. Miriam Herrera
Opinion
Case: 19-10925 Document: 00515448326 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/10/2020
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-10925 June 10, 2020 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MIRIAM CRYSTAL HERRERA, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:18-CR-6-9
Before ELROD, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Miriam Crystal Herrera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Herrera has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Herrera’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 19-10925 Document: 00515448326 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/10/2020
No. 19-10925 prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Herrera’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.