Case: 19-10308 Document: 00515492903 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/16/2020

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-10308 United States Court of Appeals Conference Calendar Fifth Circuit FILED July 16, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARTIN BUCIO-CISNEROS, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17-CR-574-1

Before KING, SOUTHWICK, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Martin Bucio-Cisneros has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bucio-Cisneros has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Bucio-Cisneros’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 19-10308 Document: 00515492903 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/16/2020

No. 19-10308 claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Bucio-Cisneros’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.