Case: 19-11282 Document: 00515501818 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/24/2020

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-11282 July 24, 2020 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MANUEL CRIADO, III, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19-CR-201-1

Before KING, SOUTHWICK, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel Criado, III, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Criado has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Criado’s response. To the extent Criado suggests that he has been denied the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 19-11282 Document: 00515501818 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/24/2020

No. 19-11282 effective assistance of counsel on appeal, the record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of such a claim; we decline to consider it, but without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.