United States v. Bronson Sanders
United States v. Bronson Sanders
Opinion
Case: 20-50058 Document: 00515518828 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/06/2020
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 20-50058 FILED August 6, 2020 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. BRONSON JAMAL SANDERS, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:19-CR-148-1
Before KING, SOUTHWICK, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Bronson Jamal Sanders has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sanders has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Sanders’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 20-50058 Document: 00515518828 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/06/2020
No. 20-50058 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Sanders’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.