United States v. Earl Harrison
United States v. Earl Harrison
Opinion
Case: 20-10243 Document: 00515594913 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/08/2020
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 8, 2020 No. 20-10243 Lyle W. Cayce Conference Calendar Clerk
United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Earl Tyrone Love Harrison, Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:19-CR-61-3
Before Dennis, Costa, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Earl Tyrone Love Harrison has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Harrison has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-10243 Document: 00515594913 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/08/2020
No. 20-10243
developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Harrison’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Harrison’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.