U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2021

United States v. Garcia

United States v. Garcia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided January 5, 2021

United States v. Garcia

Opinion

Case: 19-11316 Document: 00515694984 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/05/2021

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 5, 2021 No. 19-11316 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk

United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Manuel Garcia, Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-177-1

Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Costa, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:* Manuel Garcia pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute grams or more of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B), and to possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

Case: 19-11316 Document: 00515694984 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/05/2021 No. 19-11316

of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). The district court sentenced Garcia to a total aggregate sentence of 327 months of imprisonment. This court affirmed Garcia’s conviction and sentence on direct appeal. United States v. Garcia, 224 F. App’x 426, 427 (5th Cir. 2007).

Garcia appeals the district court’s denial of his self-styled “Motion Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742.” Section 3742 does not provide a jurisdictional basis for a post-appeal motion to reduce a sentence. United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994). “The provisions for modification of a sentence under § 3742 are available to a defendant only upon direct appeal of a sentence or conviction.” Id. We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court on the ground that the court lacked a jurisdictional basis to consider Garcia’s “meaningless, unauthorized motion.” Id.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.