Case: 20-40217 Document: 00515702379 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2021

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 11, 2021 No. 20-40217 Lyle W. Cayce Conference Calendar Clerk

United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Luis Arnoldo Curiel-Trevino, Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 7:19-CR-1488-1

Before Smith, Stewart, and Higginson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Luis Curiel-Trevino has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Curiel-Trevino has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opin- ion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

Case: 20-40217 Document: 00515702379 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/11/2021

No. 20-40217

a fair evaluation of Curiel-Trevino’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief, relevant portions of the record, and Curiel-Trevino’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further respon- sibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Curiel-Trevino’s motion for leave to file an out-of-time supplemental re- sponse or for a stay is DENIED.