U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2021

United States v. Hankins

United States v. Hankins
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 23, 2021

United States v. Hankins

Opinion

Case: 20-10610 Document: 00515792877 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/23/2021

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 23, 2021 No. 20-10610 Lyle W. Cayce Conference Calendar Clerk

United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Damon Hankins, Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:19-CR-285-3

Before Davis, Elrod, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Damon Hankins has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Hankins has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

Case: 20-10610 Document: 00515792877 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/23/2021

No. 20-10610

allow us to make a fair evaluation of Hankins’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hankins’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.