United States v. Rakestraw
United States v. Rakestraw
Opinion
Case: 20-10181 Document: 00515813865 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/08/2021
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 8, 2021 No. 20-10181 Lyle W. Cayce Conference Calendar Clerk
United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Demarcus Rakestraw, Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 3:17-CR-469-1
Before Smith, Stewart, and Higginson, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Demarcus Rakestraw has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rakestraw has filed responses.
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opin- ion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-10181 Document: 00515813865 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/08/2021
No. 20-10181
We have reviewed counsel’s brief, relevant parts of the record, and Rakestraw’s responses. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further respon- sibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.