U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2021

United States v. Cuellar

United States v. Cuellar
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 16, 2021

United States v. Cuellar

Opinion

Case: 20-10182 Document: 00515980222 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2021

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 20-10182 August 16, 2021 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Rodolfo A. Cuellar, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CR-62-1

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:* Rodolfo A. Cuellar, Jr., federal prisoner # 25755-077, was found guilty of conspiring to distribute cocaine, using a communication facility to facilitate drug trafficking, possessing heroin with intent to distribute, and employing a person under 18 years of age in the distribution of cocaine and

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

Case: 20-10182 Document: 00515980222 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2021

No. 20-10182

heroin. He is serving 40 years in prison. Cuellar moved for a sentence reduction under Section 404 of the First Step Act. The district court denied Cuellar’s motion because he had not been convicted of an offense to which Section 404 applies. Cuellar has appealed.

Generally, we review a district court’s discretionary denial of relief under Section 404 of the First Step Act for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Jackson, 945 F.3d 315, 320 (5th Cir. 2019), cert. denied, 140 S. Ct. 2699 (2020). Because the denial in this case turns on the meaning of a federal statute, we apply de novo review. Id. The record and Cuellar’s motion reflect that he had not been convicted of any offense that was the “violation of a Federal criminal statute, the statutory penalties for which were modified by section 2 or 3 of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010.” First Step Act, § 404(a), Pub. L. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222 (2018); see also Dorsey v. United States, 567 U.S. 260, 269 (2012). Accordingly, the district court did not err in denying Cuellar’s motion for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is DENIED. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED as unnecessary. Cuellar’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.