United States v. Pineda
United States v. Pineda
Opinion
Case: 20-40664 Document: 00515983147 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2021
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 18, 2021 No. 20-40664 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk
United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Raul Pineda, Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:10-CR-70-5
Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:* In 2011 Raul Pineda, federal prisoner 64133-179, was convicted of one count of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a substance containing methamphetamine, 50 grams or more of actual methamphetamine, and five kilograms or more of a substance containing a
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-40664 Document: 00515983147 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2021
No. 20-40664
detectable amount of cocaine. He was sentenced to serve a within-guidelines term of 360 months in prison and a five-year term of supervised release.
Now, he appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction, which was based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines.
When considering a § 3582(c)(2) motion, the district court first asks whether the defendant is eligible for a reduction and the extent of the reduction authorized under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10. Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 826-27 (2010). If the defendant is eligible for a reduction, then the court then asks whether, as a matter of discretion, one is warranted. Id. at 827. The district court did not err when it determined that Pineda was ineligible for a reduction. Consequently, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.