United States v. Rodriguez-Ramirez
United States v. Rodriguez-Ramirez
Opinion
Case: 20-20596 Document: 00516070158 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2021
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 26, 2021 No. 20-20596 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk
United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Walter Rodriguez-Ramirez, Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20-CR-253-1
Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Walter Rodri- guez-Ramirez, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in ac- cordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Ramirez has not filed a
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-20596 Document: 00516070158 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2021
No. 20-20596
response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the ap- peal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, we lift the abeyance previously imposed in this matter. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibili- ties herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.