U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2022

United States v. Mandujano

United States v. Mandujano
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided January 20, 2022
United States v. Mandujano

Opinion

Case: 21-10759 Document: 00516173549 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/20/2022

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 21-10759 January 20, 2022 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee, versus

Noel Mandujano,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:20-CR-15-2

Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Noel Mandujano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mandujano has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and Case: 21-10759 Document: 00516173549 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/20/2022

No. 21-10759 the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.