United States v. Clark
Opinion
Case: 21-10384 Document: 00516237860 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/14/2022
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit FILED
March 14, 2022
No. 21-10384
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee, versus
Dion Clark,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20-CV-936
Before Jones, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
Dion Clark, federal prisoner # 55856-177, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s partial denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his convictions of conspiracy to commit interference with commerce by robbery and brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence.
Case: 21-10384 Document: 00516237860 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/14/2022
No. 21-10384
This court must examine the basis of its own jurisdiction, sua sponte, if necessary. Trent v. Wade, 776 F.3d 368, 387 (5th Cir. 2015). “An appeal may be taken to the court of appeals from the order entered on the [§ 2255] motion as from a final judgment on application for a writ of habeas corpus.” § 2255(d). Here, however, Clark’s appeal is premature as he filed it before the district court resentenced him. As such, we lack jurisdiction. See Andrews v. United States, 373 U.S. 334, 340 (1963).
Accordingly, a COA is DENIED and this matter is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.