United States v. Lopez-Cervantez
United States v. Lopez-Cervantez
Opinion
Case: 21-51006 Document: 00516260840 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/30/2022
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 30, 2022 No. 21-51006 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk
United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Antonino Lopez-Cervantez, Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:21-CR-510-1
Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:* Antonino Lopez-Cervantez appeals his conviction of illegal reentry after removal and his sentence of 16 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. He maintains that his sentence exceeds the statutory
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opin- ion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-51006 Document: 00516260840 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/30/2022
No. 21-51006
maximum because the enhanced penalty provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional.
Lopez-Cervantez has filed an unopposed motion for summary dispo- sition and a letter brief correctly conceding that this issue is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 553–54 (5th Cir. 2019). Lopez-Cervantez states that he has raised the issue only to preserve it for possible further review.
Because summary disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the motion is GRANTED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.