Zurovetz v. Argenbright
Opinion
Case: 21-40653 Document: 00516298687 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/28/2022
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit FILED
April 28, 2022
No. 21-40653 Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk Todd Zurovetz,
Plaintiff—Appellant, versus
Corrections Officer Christopher Argenbright; Correction Officer Daron C. Lofton; Corrections Officer John Doe One; John Doe Two,
Defendants—Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:19-CV-481
Before Southwick, Graves, and Costa, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
Todd Zurovetz, Texas prisoner # 1931368, seeks to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) from a judgment entered after a jury verdict for the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force. Zurovetz contends
Case: 21-40653 Document: 00516298687 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/28/2022
No. 21-40653 only that certain evidence about his alleged injuries was withheld or not adduced. His conclusional assertion does not identify any nonfrivolous basis for challenging the jury’s verdict.
Because he thus identifies no nonfrivolous issue for appeal, his IFP motion is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. All of Zurovetz’s outstanding motions are DENIED.
This court’s dismissal of the appeal as frivolous counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See § 1915(g); Coleman v. Tollefson, 575 U.S. 532, 537 (2015); McGarrah v. Alford, 783 F.3d 584, 584-85 (5th Cir. 2015). Zurovetz has a prior strike. See Zurovetz v. Hurt, No. 5:19-CV-136 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 26, 2019). Accordingly, Zurovetz is WARNED that, if he accumulates three strikes, he will be barred from proceeding IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.