United States v. Hardrick
United States v. Hardrick
Opinion
Case: 20-10952 Document: 00516298872 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/28/2022
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals No. 20-10952 Fifth Circuit
consolidated with FILED No. 20-10953 April 28, 2022 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk
United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Aaron Tremmell Hardrick, Defendant—Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19-CR-352-1 USDC No. 4:19-CR-377-1
Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-10952 Document: 00516298872 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/28/2022
No. 20-10952 c/w No. 20-10953 The attorney appointed to represent Aaron Tremmell Hardrick has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hardrick filed a response. After counsel filed a supplemental Anders brief, Hardrick submitted additional filings, which we construe as implicitly moving for leave to file an out-of-time response. The motion for leave is GRANTED.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hardrick’s several filings. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.