U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2022

United States v. Calderon-Portillo

United States v. Calderon-Portillo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 9, 2022

United States v. Calderon-Portillo

Opinion

Case: 21-11097 Document: 00516466166 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/09/2022

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 9, 2022 No. 21-11097 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk

United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Samuel Steven Calderon-Portillo, Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:19-CR-260-1

Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Samuel Steven Calderon-Portillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Calderon-Portillo has not filed a

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

Case: 21-11097 Document: 00516466166 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/09/2022

No. 21-11097

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.