U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2022

United States v. Flores

United States v. Flores
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided November 14, 2022

United States v. Flores

Opinion

Case: 22-10446 Document: 00516544025 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/14/2022

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-10446 Summary Calendar FILED November 14, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Judith Sandra Flores, Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20-CR-415-1

Before Davis, Smith, and Dennis, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Judith Sandra Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

Case: 22-10446 Document: 00516544025 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/14/2022

No. 22-10446

developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Flores’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Flores’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.