United States v. Ramos
United States v. Ramos
Opinion
Case: 22-10346 Document: 00516606723 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 22-10346 FILED January 11, 2023 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Fidel Ramos, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21-CR-155-12 ______________________________ Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Fidel Ramos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Ramos has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10346 Document: 00516606723 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/11/2023
No. 22-10346
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.