United States v. Marquez
Opinion
Case: 22-51015 Document: 00516704893 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/07/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-51015
Summary Calendar FILED ____________ April 7, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus
Robert Marquez, Jr.,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:21-CR-1816-1 ______________________________
Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
Robert Marquez, Jr., appeals his 57-month sentence for the importation of five kilograms or more of cocaine and aiding and abetting. He pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement that included, inter alia, a waiver of his right to appeal. The Government seeks enforcement of the appeal waiver, and Marquez makes no arguments to the contrary.
Case: 22-51015 Document: 00516704893 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/07/2023
No. 22-51015
We review whether the appeal waiver bars Marquez’s appeal de novo. See United States v. Keele, 755 F.3d 752, 754 (5th Cir. 2014). Marquez unambiguously acknowledged that he voluntarily and knowingly waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence on any ground in the written plea agreement as well as during the plea colloquy. Given the explicit relinquishment of the right to challenge his sentence, the waiver undoubtedly “applies to the circumstances at hand.” United States v. Bond, 414 F.3d 542, 544 (5th Cir. 2005). Therefore, the record demonstrates that the appeal waiver is valid and enforceable. See id.
DISMISSED. 1
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.