Marfil v. City of New Braunfels
Marfil v. City of New Braunfels
Opinion
Case: 22-50908 Document: 00516789701 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
____________ FILED June 16, 2023 No. 22-50908 Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk Rafael Marfil; Verge Productions, L.L.C.; Enrico Marfil; Naomi Marfil; Korey A. Rholack; Daniel Olveda; Douglas Wayne Mathes, Plaintiffs—Appellants, versus City of New Braunfels, Texas, Defendant—Appellee. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:20-CV-248 ______________________________ Before Jones, Clement, and Haynes, Circuit Judges. 1 Edith H. Jones, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs here appeal the Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of their complaint alleging that the City of New Braunfels’s zoning regulation banning short- term rentals of residential properties in certain areas of the city is unconstitutional. The district court ordered dismissal by approving a few _____________________ Judge Haynes dissents. She would affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Case: 22-50908 Document: 00516789701 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2023
No. 22-50908
conclusory paragraphs in a magistrate judge’s recommendation. This court’s relevant case law, however, indicates that some factual development may often occur in these cases, and that summary judgment may often follow.
See, e.g., Mahone v. Addicks Util. Dist., 836 F.2d 921, 935–37 (5th Cir. 1988).
We make no prediction on the future course of this case, but based on the complaint’s well-pled allegations, plaintiffs are entitled to engage in discovery in an attempt to surmount the currently high bar for challenging local zoning ordinances under the Constitution.
VACATED and REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.