United States v. Jimenez
United States v. Jimenez
Opinion
Case: 22-40798 Document: 00516791897 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/19/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED June 19, 2023 No. 22-40798 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Gerardo Jimenez, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:20-CR-2062-1 ______________________________ Before Jolly, Stewart, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Gerardo Jimenez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Jimenez has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Jimenez’s claims of ineffective assistance _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-40798 Document: 00516791897 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/19/2023
No. 22-40798
of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Jimenez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.