United States v. Houston
United States v. Houston
Opinion
Case: 22-60560 Document: 00516803836 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/28/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 22-60560 June 28, 2023 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Derrick Houston, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:19-CR-65-11 ______________________________ Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: * Derrick Houston pled guilty to conspiring to commit racketeering activity. He was sentenced to 200 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. On appeal, Houston argues that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance at sentencing.
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-60560 Document: 00516803836 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/28/2023
No. 22-60560
We generally will not consider the merits of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). Although there is an exception for those “rare cases in which the record allows a reviewing court to fairly evaluate the merits of the claim,” id. (quotation marks and citation omitted), this is not one of those.
The record is not sufficiently developed to allow a fair evaluation of Houston’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. We therefore decline to consider that claim, without prejudice to Houston raising it on collateral review.
The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. Houston’s unopposed motion to seal all briefs, record excerpts, and the motion itself is GRANTED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.