United States v. Curiel
United States v. Curiel
Opinion
Case: 22-10917 Document: 00516818409 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/12/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-10917 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ July 12, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Luis Curiel, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CR-132-1 ______________________________ Before Jones, Elrod, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Luis Curiel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Curiel has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 22-10917 Document: 00516818409 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/12/2023
No. 22-10917
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.