United States v. Ramirez
Opinion
Case: 22-10965 Document: 00516823682 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/17/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-10965
Summary Calendar FILED ____________ July 17, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus
Braulio Ramirez,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:18-CR-361-1 ______________________________
Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Braulio Ramirez in his appeal of his revocation of supervised release and resulting sentence of months and one day has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United Case: 22-10965 Document: 00516823682 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/17/2023
No. 22-10965
States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramirez has not filed a response.
During the pendency of this appeal, Ramirez completed the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release and was released from custody. Because no additional term of supervised release was imposed, the instant appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as moot, and counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.