U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2023

United States v. Baker

United States v. Baker
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided November 1, 2023

United States v. Baker

Opinion

Case: 23-60010 Document: 00516953115 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/01/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-60010 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ November 1, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Cadrius Baker, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:20-CR-97-1 ______________________________ Before Barksdale, Engelhardt, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: * Following a bench trial, Cadrius Baker was convicted of: making a false statement while acquiring, or attempting to acquire, a firearm; making a false statement concerning information in an official record; and possession of a firearm by a prohibited person, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(a)(6),

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 23-60010 Document: 00516953115 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/01/2023

No. 23-60010

(n), and 924(a)(1)(A). He contends the district court erred by denying his request for a Guideline § 3E1.1 adjustment for acceptance of responsibility.

Because the sentencing court is in a unique position to evaluate defendant’s acceptance of responsibility, great deference is afforded the court’s finding: our court will “affirm the denial of a reduction for acceptance of responsibility unless it is without foundation, a standard of review more deferential than the clearly erroneous standard”. United States v. Lord, 915 F.3d 1009, 1017 (5th Cir. 2019) (citation omitted); see Guideline § 3E1.1 cmt. n.5.

Baker does not meet this standard. The court’s rejection of the requested adjustment was based on an implicit adverse credibility finding we will not disturb. See United States v. Spires, 79 F.3d 464, 467 (5th Cir. 1996) (explaining decisions concerning acceptance of responsibility will almost always be upheld because they are heavily dependent on credibility determinations).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.