United States v. Jimenez Milanes
United States v. Jimenez Milanes
Opinion
Case: 23-20347 Document: 61-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 23-20347 FILED August 16, 2024 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Hendry Jordank Jimenez Milanes, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18-CR-693-4 ______________________________ Before Haynes, Higginson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Hendry Jordank Jimenez Milanes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jimenez Milanes has filed a response. 1 We have _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
While Jimenez Milanes did not file a response in this court, he did file a pro se affidavit in the district court that we construe as a response.
Case: 23-20347 Document: 61-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2024
No. 23-20347
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Jimenez Milanes’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.