U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2024

United States v. Shadmanmehr

United States v. Shadmanmehr
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 3, 2024

United States v. Shadmanmehr

Opinion

Case: 24-50166 Document: 43-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/03/2024

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-50166 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ September 3, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Hamdollah Shadmanmehr, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:22-CR-760-1 ______________________________ Before Higginson, Ho, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Hamdollah Shadmanmehr on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Shadmanmehr has filed a response.

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 24-50166 Document: 43-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/03/2024

No. 24-50166

During the pendency of this appeal, Shadmanmehr completed the sentence imposed on revocation of supervised release and was released from custody. Because he has not shown that he will suffer collateral consequences as a result of the revocation of his supervised release and because no additional term of supervised release was imposed, the instant appeal does not present a case or controversy, and this court lacks jurisdiction. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998).

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as moot, and counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.