Case: 24-10425 Document: 27-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/09/2024

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED September 9, 2024 No. 24-10425 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk

Kenneth Johnson, Plaintiff—Appellant, versus Seagraves Compress, Trinity Company, Defendant—Appellee. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:23-CV-209 ______________________________ Before Jolly, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:* Kenneth Johnson, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint in which he alleged that he was wrongfully terminated and discriminated against on the basis of his race. The district court noted that Johnson’s original complaint was deficient because he failed to file his lawsuit within ninety days of receiving his right to sue _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 24-10425 Document: 27-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/09/2024

No. 24-10425

letter from the EEOC. See Taylor v. Books A Million, Inc., 296 F.3d 376, 379 (5th Cir. 2002). The district court then gave Johnson an opportunity to amend his complaint. Johnson filed an amended complaint, but he failed to explain or excuse the untimeliness. The district court then dismissed Johnson’s complaint. Johnson has appealed.

On appeal, Johnson does not challenge the district court’s finding that his complaint is untimely; he merely restates the facts in his complaint. The facts show that his complaint is untimely: the EEOC issued Johnson a right to sue letter dated September 29, 2022, which Johnson alleged was postmarked May 9, 2023. Johnson did not state when he received the letter, so the district court assumed that he received the letter at the most seven days later than the postmark, on May 16, 2023. See id. at 379–80. Johnson had ninety days from that date to file his lawsuit. But he did not file this lawsuit until 114 days later, on September 7, 2023. Thus, his complaint is barred because it is untimely. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court dismissing the complaint is, in all respects, AFFIRMED.