Abraham Watkins v. Festeryga

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Abraham Watkins v. Festeryga, 113 F.4th 1019 (5th Cir. 2024)

Abraham Watkins v. Festeryga

Opinion

         United States Court of Appeals
              for the Fifth Circuit                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                          Fifth Circuit

                               ___________                              FILED
                                                                September 11, 2024
                                No. 23-20337
                                                                   Lyle W. Cayce
                               ___________                              Clerk

Abraham Watkins Nichols Agosto Aziz & Stogner,

                                                            Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                     versus

Edward Festeryga,

                                         Defendant—Appellant.
                ______________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Texas
                         USDC No. 4:22-CV-4249
                ______________________________

           ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

          (Opinion July 25, 2024, 5 Cir., 2024, 
109 F.4th 810
)

Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart,
Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett,
Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, Douglas, and
Ramirez, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:
       A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for
rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service
and not disqualified having voted in favor,
                                 No. 23-20337




       IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en
banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will
specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to
5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion is this case dated July 25, 2024, is
VACATED.




                                      2


Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published