United States v. Renteria-Ocampos
United States v. Renteria-Ocampos
Opinion
Case: 24-10317 Document: 50-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/07/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-10317 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ October 7, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Jesus Renteria-Ocampos, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:23-CR-198-1 ______________________________ Before Graves, Willett, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Renteria-Ocampos seeks leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Renteria-Ocampos has filed a response. To the extent Renteria-Ocampos argues his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance, the record is not _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 24-10317 Document: 50-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/07/2024
No. 24-10317
sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of his claim; we therefore decline to consider the issue without prejudice to collateral review.
See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have, however, reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Renteria-Ocampos’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.