United States v. Gibson
United States v. Gibson
Opinion
Case: 24-40094 Document: 52-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/27/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED November 27, 2024 No. 24-40094 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Michael Ian Gibson, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CR-173-1 ______________________________ Before Haynes, Higginson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Michael Ian Gibson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gibson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 24-40094 Document: 52-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/27/2024
No. 24-40094
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 1
_____________________ This, of course, does not affect the ability of the defendant to seek correction of any clerical error under Rule 36.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.