U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2024

Blake v. Smith

Blake v. Smith
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 30, 2024

Blake v. Smith

Opinion

Case: 24-10249 Document: 32-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/30/2024

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-10249 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ December 30, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Faith Blake, Clerk Petitioner—Appellant, versus Michael Smith, Warden, Federal Medical Center-Carswell, Respondent—Appellee. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:23-CV-238 ______________________________ Before Jones, Dennis, and Southwick, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: * Faith Blake, federal prisoner # 73053-279, appeals the dismissal of a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging her convictions and sentences for two counts of conspiracy to distribute and dispense controlled substances and one count of failure to appear. We review the district court’s factual findings for

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 24-10249 Document: 32-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/30/2024

No. 24-10249

clear error and its legal conclusions de novo. Jeffers v. Chandler, 253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th Cir. 2001).

To proceed with her challenge under § 2241, Blake must satisfy the “‘savings clause’” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e) by showing that “unusual circumstances make it impossible or impracticable to seek relief in the sentencing court.” Jones v. Hendrix, 599 U.S. 465, 478 (2023). She has abandoned any argument that she has satisfied the savings clause by failing to brief it adequately before this court. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224- (5th Cir. 1993). To the extent Blake contends that she is actually innocent, she has not established that actual innocence provides a gateway for review of claims raised in a § 2241 petition. See McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383, 386 (2013); Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 315 (1995).

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.