Chisom v. State of Louisiana

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Chisom v. State of Louisiana

Opinion

       United States Court of Appeals
            for the Fifth Circuit                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                         Fifth Circuit

                            ___________                                FILED
                                                                January 29, 2024
                             No. 22-30320                         Lyle W. Cayce
                            ___________                                Clerk

Ronald Chisom; Marie Bookman, also known as Governor;
Urban League of Louisiana,

                                                    Plaintiffs—Appellees,

United States of America; Bernette J. Johnson,

                                          Intervenor Plaintiffs—Appellees,

                                 versus

State of Louisiana, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General,

                                       Defendant—Appellant.
              ______________________________

              Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                       USDC No. 2:86-CV-4075
              ______________________________

         ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

      (Opinion October 25, 2023, 5 Cir., 2023, 
85 F. 4th 288
 )

Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart,
Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett,
Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, Douglas, and
Ramirez, Circuit Judges.
                                  No. 22-30320




Per Curiam:
       A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for
rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service
and not disqualified having voted in favor,
       IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en
banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will
specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to
5th Circuit Rule 42.3, the panel opinion in this case dated October 25, 2023,
is VACATED.




                                       2


Reference

Status
Unpublished