U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2024

United States v. Cato

United States v. Cato
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 1, 2024

United States v. Cato

Opinion

Case: 23-10747 Document: 00517052286 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/01/2024

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-10747 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ February 1, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Montray Lorenzo Cato, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CR-194-1 ______________________________ Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Montray Cato has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cato has not filed a response.

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record.

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 23-10747 Document: 00517052286 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/01/2024

No. 23-10747

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo- lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.